The new Unjustifiably Harsh Consequences Test applies in Spouse Visa and Family Member Visa applications, where applicants do not meet the Minimum Income Requirement under Appendix FM Immigration Rules. However, if the Home Office accepts that the refusal could lead to unjustifiably harsh … See more The new Home Office Policy Guidance has set out a Two-Stage Test to be applied in Spouse Visa and Family Member Visa applications in situations when the … See more The Home Office has inserted a new paragraph 21A under Appendix FM-SE Immigration Rules, which sets out where the Minimum Income Requirement is not … See more To make a successful Spouse Visa application you must meet the Home Office’s requirements, we have previously written about the stringent … See more WebMar 6, 2024 · Likewise, the Family Policy guidance also defines ‘unjustifiably harsh consequences’, as “harsh outcome(s) for the applicant or their family which is not justified by the public interest
Immigration Rules Appendix Family Reunion (Protection)
WebMar 6, 2024 · Instead, ‘exceptional’ means circumstances in which refusal of the application could or would result in unjustifiably harsh consequences for the individual or their family such that refusal would not be proportionate under Article 8.”. Likewise, the Family Policy guidance also defines ‘unjustifiably harsh consequences’, as “harsh ... WebAug 1, 2024 · 32. In the alternative, the Appellant relies on there being unjustifiably harsh consequences on the Appellant, his partner and/or her son by the refusal of leave to remain such that he satisfies paragraph GEN.3.2 of Appendix FM and/or his removal would be a disproportionate interference with their right to respect for private and family life. 33. top goal scorers 2022/23
The Court of Appeal
WebAug 2, 2024 · Leave outside the rules on compelling compassionate factors is, broadly speaking, where a refusal of entry clearance or leave to remain in the UK would result in unjustifiably harsh consequences for the applicant or a family member, but which do not render refusal a breach of Article 8, Article 3, refugee convention or other obligations. WebNov 28, 2014 · ‘In my judgment, it would be sufficient for the Secretary of State to take the factors I have identified into account in assessing whether there were "exceptional circumstances" applying the criterion of whether the circumstances were "compelling" such as to produce "unjustifiably harsh consequences" so as to outweigh the public interest’. WebMay 16, 2024 · However, looking at the decision taken, the result would have been the same, and she not having put forward anything which might constitute ‘exceptional … top goal scorers bundesliga